What's happening in Europe?

 

Europe Trade Specialists 

 

3L-Leemark Logistics Limited

Where there's 3L, there's a way!
More....

 

Odyssey International (HK) Ltd.

We can provide excellent services
in order to meet customers'
satisfaction.
More....

 

Tianjin Shengyuanyujia
International Forwarding

We are the professional logistics
supplier you can depend on!
More....

 

Orient Express Container
(HK) Co., Ltd.

Trust, Service, Competitiveness
and Efficiency are our promises to
you.
More....

 

CASA China Limited Shenzhen

Call Anytime, Service Anywhere.
More....

 

Qingdao Wintrust logistics
Co., Ltd

Eager to progress - we serve
costumers honestly and approved
by vast majority of customers
More....

 

Worldex Logistics Qingdao Co., Ltd.

Logistics Service Provider
More....

 

T & H Logistics (HK) Co., Ltd.

Provide multi-models cargo
forwarding services
More....

 

Fast-Link Express Ltd.

Link to Fast-Link, link all over the
world
More....


TES Logistic & Transport
(International) Ltd 

We are not the big one but prefer
and knee to be one of the best
player in our industry.
More....

 

 

 


Information overload leaves industry confused about outlook    More....

East-West rates sharp slump reveals rising volatility in container shipping
  
More....

The covert consolidation of the container shipping industry More....

 

Record-high delivery of boxships in 2013, but fleet growth may
be marginal

 


Page 3 of 3

The top 21 container shipping lines collectively lost a total of US$239 million last year, which is actually not that bad considering the market situation.

The year before these same carriers lost approximately $5.9 billion.

Certainly 2012 saw a dramatic turnaround, even if the industry as a whole did not return to the black.

A number of individual shipping lines did, however.

CMA CGM managed a profit of $989 million, while Maersk Line came away with earnings of $483 million. Hong Kong's OOCL was another, posting a profit of $230 million.

Also rounding out the year in profitable territory was Wan Hai at $94 million, Hapag Lloyd at $34 million, SITC at $32 million and CCNI at $11 million.

Clearly, it is possible to still produce good results in a challenging market.

Given that this year's supply and demand, when extenuating factors are taken into account, looks as though it could be quite even - and therefore will likely leave the industry in a similar position to last year - there is no reason for there to be disastrous losses like what we witnessed in 2009 and 2011.

Of course the pace of scrapping could slow and carriers may look to activate more of their idle tonnage in the coming months, which would seriously alter the above figures.

But then again, demand could grow at a greater rate than three per cent. And in fact Clarkson Research Services predicts it could reach as high as 5.8 per cent.

It is truly difficult to know what will happen exactly. This is the key difficulty to any forecast. The future often presents us with plenty of surprises.

What we can say, definitively, however is that the raw data on supply and demand should not cause too much alarm. There are many factors that can impact the effect these numbers will have, even if the estimates are 100 per cent accurate.

The key, as is always the case, is how the shipping lines not only manage their capacity going forward, but how they conduct themselves on pricing. Do they go for market share at any cost? Or do they accept the difficult market environment and take steps to promote stability instead?

Once we have some answers on these two points, then we can more accurately begin to talk about what kind of year it is going to be for the container shipping industry.

 

Page  1  2  3



* - Indicate required field(s).

Have fears regarding overcapacity in 2013 been blown out of
proportion? What are your expectations for the supply and
demand balance this year?
 

* Message:


* Email :